ABSOLUTELY! COME BACK SO I CAN THROW A SHOE AT YOU FOR CHOOSING JOHN ROBERTS. |
Friday, June 29, 2012
The Redacted and Abridged CONstitution
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Dr. Strangehate
Shunning the obvious, many scientists refuse to accept the conclusion of an intelligent Creator of the universe and its lifeforms. Instead, they propose preposterous explanations for both the existence of the universe and its lifeforms.
Preposterous explanation number 1. Darwinism - Speciation through evolution was once a sensible theory but that time has long passed. When Charles Darwin proposed his theory the cell was thought to be a simple container of "living substance". Discoveries in Biochemistry and Cellular Biology have shown the cell to have factories, waste disposal systems, information storage and retrieval systems, and methods of propulsion that are far more advanced than anything Man has yet devised. The bacterial flagellum is an inboard motor capable of self-repair and tens of thousands of rotations per minute.
In the approximately 150 years of the theory's existence there has not been one proven example of speciation occurring through evolutionary means. As science the theory has no value, but it is Progressivism's favorite cudgel against religion.
Preposterous explanation number 2. Multiverses - When scientists began to see that the physical laws, atomic and quantum particles, and the energies of the universe were extremely fine tuned to foster life, it wasn't a cause of celebration: This pointed to an Intelligent Designer. What to do? When you have one universe so finely tuned, you explain it away by proposing an infinite number of universes, i.e. a multiverse. With an infinite number of universes there will be some that look designed due to random chance. This theory is unproveable because a scientist has an infinitely better chance of observing God than another universe.
Preposterous explanation number 3. The universe began in a Big Bang comprised of nothing. I mean nothing as in not a damn thing...no matter, no energy, zippo! Stephen Hawking is a proponent of this theory.
Preposterous explanation number 4. Manmade global warming - Along with Darwinism a favorite of progressives. You're a heretic and a sinner against the Goddess, Mother Nature, if you do not believe.
Darwinism means you're just an outcome of chaotic, random, mindless processes. A multiverse means you're even more insignificant than Darwin would have you. And Stephen Hawking would have you believe that you are really nothing.
Have a nice day!
Or How Scientists Learned to Deny God
STEPHEN HAWKING & DR. STRANGELOVE |
Shunning the obvious, many scientists refuse to accept the conclusion of an intelligent Creator of the universe and its lifeforms. Instead, they propose preposterous explanations for both the existence of the universe and its lifeforms.
Preposterous explanation number 1. Darwinism - Speciation through evolution was once a sensible theory but that time has long passed. When Charles Darwin proposed his theory the cell was thought to be a simple container of "living substance". Discoveries in Biochemistry and Cellular Biology have shown the cell to have factories, waste disposal systems, information storage and retrieval systems, and methods of propulsion that are far more advanced than anything Man has yet devised. The bacterial flagellum is an inboard motor capable of self-repair and tens of thousands of rotations per minute.
In the approximately 150 years of the theory's existence there has not been one proven example of speciation occurring through evolutionary means. As science the theory has no value, but it is Progressivism's favorite cudgel against religion.
Preposterous explanation number 2. Multiverses - When scientists began to see that the physical laws, atomic and quantum particles, and the energies of the universe were extremely fine tuned to foster life, it wasn't a cause of celebration: This pointed to an Intelligent Designer. What to do? When you have one universe so finely tuned, you explain it away by proposing an infinite number of universes, i.e. a multiverse. With an infinite number of universes there will be some that look designed due to random chance. This theory is unproveable because a scientist has an infinitely better chance of observing God than another universe.
Preposterous explanation number 3. The universe began in a Big Bang comprised of nothing. I mean nothing as in not a damn thing...no matter, no energy, zippo! Stephen Hawking is a proponent of this theory.
Preposterous explanation number 4. Manmade global warming - Along with Darwinism a favorite of progressives. You're a heretic and a sinner against the Goddess, Mother Nature, if you do not believe.
Darwinism means you're just an outcome of chaotic, random, mindless processes. A multiverse means you're even more insignificant than Darwin would have you. And Stephen Hawking would have you believe that you are really nothing.
Have a nice day!
Monday, June 25, 2012
Bare Asses and Bad Asses
ADOLPH HITLER & NAZI PELOSI |
RIDDLE: What's the difference between a sewer rat and a Democrat politician?
ANSWER: A sewer rat lives an honest life.
San Franciscans believe one of their inalienable rights is the liberty to bare their asses in public. They're not too keen on the right to bear arms. Their attitude on the Constitution in general is such that restaurants would probably have no qualms using the Constitution as paper coverlets for their chairs in preparation for their undressed clientele. It's no wonder then why they elect Nazi Pelosi over and over again.
Just as Adolph Hitler used Jews as scapegoats, Nazi Pelosi uses Republicans. Last week she said Republicans are voting to charge Eric Holder with contempt in a ruse to stop Holder from fighting voter suppression in Florida and other states. Isn't it odd that Nazi never saw any voter suppression by the Black Panthers holding billy clubs outside a voting precinct in 2008? With Democrats it's not voter suppression if it's your side doing the suppression or intimidation. Actually, it's a good thing if an illegal vote negates the vote of an informed, analytical citizen. You know, a Republican.
Speaking at a podium, Nazi's arms and hands wave about like drunken serpents in a spastic caricature of Adolph Hitler. At any moment I expect her hair to turn into a mat of wriggling snake heads. Instead of her gaze turning men into stone though, men's masculinity withdraws in recoiled terror. The only thing imaginable that could cause more emasculating terror would be to see Michelle Obama in a black leather leotard, the chiseled muscles of her obsidian arms forcing out sweat with each crack of her whip. With a sneer on her face as when she sees an American flag, she would be one bad ass momma!
Saturday, June 23, 2012
Riddle Me This
Riddle: What's the difference between Michelle Obama cursing the American flag at the tenth anniversary of 9/11 and gay activists at the White House flipping their finger at Ronald Reagan's portrait?
Answer: You paid 5 trillion dollars to see Michelle's curse.
Michelle Obama called the American flag a "damn flag" at the tenth anniversary ceremony of 9/11 at Ground Zero. She and Barack were the most pampered people at the event, with the "best seats in the house", and watched the flag-folding ceremony behind bullet proof glass. Yet, she was obviously disgusted by the special treatment the American flag received.
WATCH IT FOR YOURSELF:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJgWMI0hch8&feature=related
Obama Boo-Boo Doll
OBAMA BOO-BOO DOLL |
That old black magic will have you in its spell. No, I'm not talking about voodoo. I'm talking about the bewitching fun you'll have with your own Obama Boo-Boo Doll! Print the doll image and paste it to a block of styrofoam. Then cut out the pin labels, grab some pins and let the fun begin!
Make your own pin labels! Watch the news for the latest gaffe you can "pin" on this administration. You'll be having so much fun, you'll want it to never end!
PIN LABELS
$800 BILLION NON-STIMULUS
FORCED ABORTIFACIENTS
$5 TRILLION DEBT ADDED
SOLYNDRA
REDEFINE MARRIAGE
SHOVEL READY JOBS BOO-BOO
KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE
BOWING & KOWTOWING
ABANDONMENT OF IRANIAN PEOPLE
LIBYAN PEOPLE YES, SYRIAN PEOPLE NO
ISLAM YES, CHRISTIANITY NO
Thursday, June 21, 2012
Bozo sapiens
RIDDLE: WHAT'S THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN UNDERWEAR BOMBER AND A DEMOCRAT?
ANSWER: AN UNDERWEAR BOMBER KNOWS HE HAS TO PACK DYNAMITE IN HIS DRAWERS AND A DEMOCRAT THINKS THERE'S DYNAMITE ALREADY IN HIS DRAWERS.
Wednesday, June 13, 2012
The Fruit of Sin
Coming to a Voting Precinct Near You!
Tuesday, June 12, 2012
I'll Take "Obama Flunkies" for 200, Alex
1. This Obama flunky is the White House National Security Advisor and quite possibly a traitor to the United States.
Who is: A) Tom Donilon
B) Van Jones
C) David Axelrod
2. This Chicago slum queen was ready to cash in big time, but her boss couldn't bring home the bacon in Copenhagen.
Who is: A) Elizabeth Warren
B) Valerie Jarrett
C) Anita Dunn
3. The definition of blarney is nonsense or hooey. This flunky is all blarney.
Who is A) Jay "Blarney" Carney
B) David Axelrod
C) Both A and B
4. This Oklahoma-born "cheery Okie" is so damn stupid she wants credit for founding the Occupy Wall Street movement.
Who is A) Anita Dunn
B) Elizabeth Warren
C) Valerie Jarrett
5. This former White House employee said her favorite philosophers are Mao Zedong and Mother Theresa so she probably liked the White House Christmas ornament with Mao's face.
Who is A) Anita Dunn
B) Elizabeth Warren
C) Valerie Jarrett
6. This former White House employee in reference to native Americans screamed, "Give them the wealth! Give them the wealth!". Who knew he meant Elizabeth "Dances with Czars" Warren?
Who is A) Van Jones
B) David Axelrod
C) Jay Carney
7. Obama has run out of faithful surrogates so he had to send "Juan Valdez" out to speak for him.
Who is A) David Axelrod
B) Jay Carney
C) Van Jones
8. This woman claimed to have made $100,000 profit on a $1,000 investment in cattle futures in less than 1 year by teaching herself about the cattle market. The only thing this woman really knows about cattle is what she's learned having lived with her husband's bullshit.
Who is A) Elizabeth Warren
B) Hillary Clinton
C) Valerie Jarrett
ANSWERS: 1A,2B,3C,4B,5A,6A,7A,8B
ANSWERS: 1A,2B,3C,4B,5A,6A,7A,8B
Monday, June 11, 2012
Data Mining a Simple Sentence
"The notion that my White House would purposely release classified national security information is offensive."
So said Barack Obama following allegations that classified information was being leaked to the media. Why did he say my White House instead of my administration? Was that a Freudian slip telling us what Obama thinks: The White House is his house? Why say release instead of leak? This is a story about the leaking of secret information. This is not a story about the administration releasing information in a Friday evening document dump. Did Obama err and say release because he approves of the leaks? And, lastly, why use the word offensive? Instead of being outraged that someone is leaking cyber warfare intelligence to the media, Obama is more worried about an assumed attack on his character.
What Obama should have been offended by was an audience thinking he would make a morally depraved joke about his own wife. That happened.
I'm waiting, but not holding my breath, for him to tell that audience of supporters how offended he was.
Friday, June 8, 2012
Mad Max Beyond "Plunder Dome"
Two women enter, each one thieves!
Two women enter, each one thieves!
Mad Maxine Waters has returned to fight under the "Plunder Dome" of the US Capitol. She and her ally Nancy Pelosi are formidable opponents for the Right due to the pair's mendacity and unethical behavior. Conservative men are no match for them since the very thought of whistling at them makes men go into convulsions.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)