Monday, June 27, 2016

A Childish Oaf is Messing With Oaths



"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

When Barack Obama swore an oath to execute the office of President of the United States, he must have thought that meant to kill it.  When he stated that he would, to the best of his ability, defend the Constitution, either his abilities are completely lacking - I can buy that -  or he thought to preserve and protect the Constitution meant to take care of the parchment it was written on.  So far, if we can trust the media, he hasn't taken a black crayon to Article I (legislative powers) or the 2nd Amendment.

What infantile Obama hasn't done with crayon, he's done with malfeasance.  Malfeasance is "the performance by a public official of an act that is legally unjustified, harmful or contrary to law".  Change the definition to the plural "acts" and it is the perfect description of Obama's presidency.  Jurisprudence under Barack Obama is not a "philosophy of law", it is the absence of law.

One of the newest revelations of Obama's malfeasance is his administration's change to the Oath of Allegiance for naturalized American citizens.  In July 2015, the oath was changed to remove the pledge that new citizens will defend the country they supposedly want to become a part of.  Obama and John Kerry would say that the pledge to defend one's country is "so last century".  Now, if there was a pledge to risk one's life in defense of the European Union, global elites and Islam, Obama would be all in.




No comments:

Post a Comment